The $2 trillion venture capital industry could see portfolio markdowns of 25 per cent to 30 per cent — a “haircut” of possibly $500 billion — following <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/business/banking/2023/03/11/svb-with-assets-of-209bn-was-the-second-biggest-bank-failure-in-us-history/" target="_blank">the Silicon Valley Bank debacle, </a>according to Bloomberg Intelligence. “After the failure of SVB, we expect greater valuation scrutiny and disclosure, especially as a large chunk of ‘fiduciary’ capital from pension funds has flowed into these markets — and unlike endowments and family offices, there are no avenues to extend and pretend,” Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Gaurav Patankar writes in a note on Friday. Some VC and private equity firms are turning towards strategies to “extend” and “pretend,” meaning they would hold on to assets or prop up capital to avoid true price discovery, Mr Patankar added. Examples of this include net asset value loans that let general partners borrow against a pool of portfolio companies within a fund, GP-led secondary structures where a fund sponsor sells one or more assets from a fund it already manages to a new fund, and alternative financing via private credit. But those methods can only delay but not deny the ultimate fundamental problem of “untenable” and “unrealistic nature” of venture valuations, he said. "There are enough zombie companies with frothy valuations that need restructuring, price discovery and of course retooling of their business models to a world of tighter credit, subdued revenue and higher rates,” Mr Patankar added.