Libya is at a pivotal moment as the <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/mena/2024/08/30/how-libyas-unfolding-central-bank-feud-could-escalate-tension/" target="_blank">fight for control of its central bank </a>intensifies. This conflict extends beyond local concerns, with strong ramifications for the country’s economic stability, political future and appeal to international investors. As the struggle for the central bank escalates, it not only sharpens Libya’s political divisions but also<a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/us/2024/08/30/lack-of-accountability-in-libyas-tarhuna-could-deepen-instability-un-warns/" target="_blank"> threatens the country’s fragile efforts at reconciliation</a> and economic recovery. Since the fall of Muammar Qaddafi in 2011, <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/tags/libya/" target="_blank">Libya </a>has been deeply fragmented, with competing administrations in the east and west battling for control of key state institutions. The <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/business/energy/libya-s-central-bank-warns-over-oil-disruption-s-impact-on-revenues-1.624160" target="_blank">Central Bank of Libya (CBL)</a> has become a critical focal point in this struggle due to its crucial role in managing the <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/business/energy/2024/09/02/is-there-an-end-in-sight-for-the-libya-oil-crisis/" target="_blank">nation’s oil revenue </a>and foreign reserves. Controlling the CBL is effectively controlling Libya’s economic lifeblood, making it a strategic asset in the broader power struggle. In recent months, both factions have increased their efforts to dominate the CBL through strategic appointments and administrative changes. These actions have heightened tensions and further complicated international efforts to foster unity and organise national elections. The continuing conflict over the CBL is a significant barrier to political reconciliation, as the battle for financial resources intensifies mistrust, making collaborative governance even more difficult to achieve. The economic consequences of this deadlock are evident. Delays in paying public sector salaries have eroded both morale and productivity, while interruptions in essential public services are disrupting everyday life and economic activities. Additionally, the continuing economic instability has worsened the humanitarian crisis, with the poverty rate climbing and access to basic needs becoming limited. For global investors, Libya’s unstable economic environment poses serious risks, and thus, they must approach the country with a high degree of caution, fully aware of the volatile and uncertain environment. The absence of financial stability and clear governance structures discourages the foreign investment crucial for the country’s economic diversification and growth. As the country seeks a path to stability, strategic investments in critical sectors such as infrastructure, financial services and governance could potentially yield significant returns, especially through public-private partnerships. However, these opportunities are fraught with substantial risks. The persistent power struggle could lead to sudden policy changes and regulatory uncertainty, making the investment climate highly unpredictable. Additionally, fluctuations in oil revenue and issues with financial management further complicate the market, posing significant challenges to investment security and profitability. The conflict over Libya’s central bank extends beyond its borders, carrying significant geopolitical consequences. The country’s strategic position in North Africa, its abundant oil reserves and its influence on regional stability mean that the outcome of this struggle is of great interest to global powers and investors. With the largest proven oil reserves in Africa, Libya plays a crucial role in the global energy market. Control of the central bank, which oversees the distribution of oil revenue, directly impacts the country’s ability to sustain and increase oil production. Any disruption or change in control could lead to fluctuations in global oil prices, affecting both producers and consumers worldwide. Global powers, including the US, Russia and European countries, have taken an active interest in Libya’s political situation. The US has long been interested in stabilising Libya as part of its broader Middle East and North Africa strategy, with American businesses, particularly in the oil and gas sector, standing to benefit. Russia, motivated by both economic and geopolitical factors, is seeking to expand its influence in the Mediterranean and secure lucrative arms and energy deals. The EU views a unified and stable Libya as crucial for controlling migration flows across the Mediterranean and reducing regional security threats. The instability in Libya’s financial governance also undermines the country’s ability to participate in international trade, attract foreign direct investment, and secure necessary international loans and aid. This uncertainty directly affects global businesses with ties to Libya, creating challenges such as payment delays, difficulties in contract enforcement and disruptions in supply chains. While these issues present serious risks, they also create specific opportunities for companies that can provide essential services like risk management, insurance and logistical support to help stabilise business operations in the region. However, any potential opportunities must be weighed against the substantial risks inherent in operating in such a volatile environment. The struggle for control over Libya’s central bank encapsulates the broader issues of political fragmentation, economic instability and competition for resources that the country faces. While navigating the Libyan market requires managing complex risks, the rewards are far from guaranteed. The decisions made by Libya’s leaders and the international community at this critical juncture will shape the country’s future and its role in the global economy. Investors who grasp the strategic significance of this conflict and approach it with a clear-eyed understanding of the risks involved may find opportunities, but success will depend on careful, informed engagement rather than optimism alone. <i>Falah Mousa is a Brussels-based government affairs specialist and researcher</i>