Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, left, and former defence minister Yoav Gallant. AP
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, left, and former defence minister Yoav Gallant. AP
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, left, and former defence minister Yoav Gallant. AP
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, left, and former defence minister Yoav Gallant. AP

How the world reacted to ICC arrest warrant for Israeli PM Netanyahu


Anjana Sankar
  • English
  • Arabic

Live updates: Follow the latest on Israel-Gaza

A mix of relief, euphoria, outrage, and dismay marked the International Criminal Court's decision to issue arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant. Israel and its allies condemned the warrants.

The court also issued a warrant for Hamas military commander Mohammed Deif, who may have died in the Gaza war, according to reports. The ICC accused all three of war crimes and crimes against humanity in connection with the October 7 attacks by the Palestinian group on Israel and the retaliatory devastating Israeli military campaign in Gaza.

The ruling is the culmination of a process that started when ICC prosecutor Karim Khan announced on May 20 that he was seeking arrest warrants for the three accused. The ICC said it found “reasonable grounds” to allege that Israel’s siege of Gaza created conditions “calculated to bring about the destruction of part of the civilian population.”

Demonstrators protest against the Israeli government's handling of the Gaza conflict, in Tel Aviv, Israel. Reuters
Demonstrators protest against the Israeli government's handling of the Gaza conflict, in Tel Aviv, Israel. Reuters

Mixed reaction globally

South Africa, which has accused Israel of genocide in Gaza at the ICC, welcomed the decision. “These actions mark a significant step towards justice for crimes against humanity and war crimes in Palestine,” it said in a statement.

The Palestinian Authority hailed the decision, describing it as a beacon of hope for justice, although it avoided mentioning the warrant issued for Hamas’s military leader. Hamas itself called the ICC’s move symbolic but a “first step showing international commitment to justice".

Francesca Albanese, the UN’s special rapporteur on Palestine and one of the most vocal critics of Israel's war in Gaza, called the ICC’s issuing of arrest warrants a “rare moment of euphoria”.

“I want to acknowledge the innumerable victims of too many wars on Gaza, and the indomitable work of Palestinian [human rights organisations] without whom the hope brought about by the ICC decision today, would have not come,” she wrote on X.

In contrast, the US condemned the ICC’s actions. President Joe Biden called the warrants “outrageous” and reaffirmed Washington’s unwavering support for Israel. “Let me be clear once again,” Mr Biden said in a statement, “there is no equivalence – none – between Israel and Hamas.”

A White House representative said the US “fundamentally rejects the Court’s decision” to issue arrest warrants for senior Israeli officials.

“We remain deeply concerned by the Prosecutor’s rush to seek arrest warrants and the troubling process errors that led to this decision,” the representative said, adding the US was discussing next steps with its partners.

Bernie Sanders, independent US senator, said he supported the ICC decision and added that all three accused “launched indiscriminate attacks against civilians and caused unimaginable human suffering”.

Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu dismissed the charges in a video posted on social media, calling the decision “antisemitic” and an attack on Israel’s right to defend itself. “This is a dark day in the history of humanity. The ICC, which was invented to protect humanity, has today become the enemy of humanity,” he said.

“The attempt to deny Israel its right to achieve its goals in its just war will fail,” Mr Gallant said, criticising the court.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau reiterated Canada’s adherence to international law, stating it would comply with any ICC obligations should Mr Netanyahu or Mr Gallant travel to the country.

The International Criminal Court in The Hague, Netherlands. EPA
The International Criminal Court in The Hague, Netherlands. EPA

EU leaders offered mixed responses, with EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell emphasising the need to respect the court’s independence.

The Netherlands, Switzerland, Ireland, Italy, and Spain all said they would meet their commitments and obligations regarding the Rome Statute and International Law. Austria made the same pledge, although its Foreign Minister Alexander Schallenberg added that the warrant was absurd.

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, whose country holds the EU's rotating presidency, on Friday said he would invite Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu to visit and defy an ICC arrest warrant.

"Later today, I will invite the Israeli Prime Minister, Mr. Netanyahu, to visit Hungary, where I will guarantee him, if he comes, that the judgment of the International Criminal Court will have no effect in Hungary, and that we will not follow its terms", Orban told state radio.

Turkey's Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan described the ICC arrest warrant as “hopeful” and said that it marked an extremely important step in bringing to justice Israeli authorities who “committed genocide” against Palestinians.

China on Friday hoped the ICC will uphold an "objective and just position [and] exercise its powers in accordance with the law," Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian said at a regular press conference in response to a question about the court's warrant for Mr Netanyahu.

Jordan's Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi said the ICC rulings should be respected and implemented, adding that “Palestinians deserve justice”.

All 124 member states of the ICC are obliged by the court's founding statute to arrest the accused.

The Iraqi government praised the ICC's decision calling it a “courageous and just stance” and one that reaffirms that “justice and truth” will prevail.

Human Rights Watch labelled the ICC’s decision a breakthrough that challenges the perception that powerful leaders are above the law, urging the global community to support the court’s efforts.

Expert input

If you had all the money in the world, what’s the one sneaker you would buy or create?

“There are a few shoes that have ‘grail’ status for me. But the one I have always wanted is the Nike x Patta x Parra Air Max 1 - Cherrywood. To get a pair in my size brand new is would cost me between Dh8,000 and Dh 10,000.” Jack Brett

“If I had all the money, I would approach Nike and ask them to do my own Air Force 1, that’s one of my dreams.” Yaseen Benchouche

“There’s nothing out there yet that I’d pay an insane amount for, but I’d love to create my own shoe with Tinker Hatfield and Jordan.” Joshua Cox

“I think I’d buy a defunct footwear brand; I’d like the challenge of reinterpreting a brand’s history and changing options.” Kris Balerite

 “I’d stir up a creative collaboration with designers Martin Margiela of the mixed patchwork sneakers, and Yohji Yamamoto.” Hussain Moloobhoy

“If I had all the money in the world, I’d live somewhere where I’d never have to wear shoes again.” Raj Malhotra

About Proto21

Date started: May 2018
Founder: Pir Arkam
Based: Dubai
Sector: Additive manufacturing (aka, 3D printing)
Staff: 18
Funding: Invested, supported and partnered by Joseph Group

Trump v Khan

2016: Feud begins after Khan criticised Trump’s proposed Muslim travel ban to US

2017: Trump criticises Khan’s ‘no reason to be alarmed’ response to London Bridge terror attacks

2019: Trump calls Khan a “stone cold loser” before first state visit

2019: Trump tweets about “Khan’s Londonistan”, calling him “a national disgrace”

2022:  Khan’s office attributes rise in Islamophobic abuse against the major to hostility stoked during Trump’s presidency

July 2025 During a golfing trip to Scotland, Trump calls Khan “a nasty person”

Sept 2025 Trump blames Khan for London’s “stabbings and the dirt and the filth”.

Dec 2025 Trump suggests migrants got Khan elected, calls him a “horrible, vicious, disgusting mayor”

Updated: November 22, 2024, 11:48 AM